By contrast, the prospect of our own deaths, despite the terror it inspires, does little to undermine our confidence in the value of our activities. This conclusion complicates widespread assumptions about human egoism and individualism. Scheffler adds that, although we are not unreasonable to fear death, personal immortality, like the imminent extinction of humanity, would also undermine our confidence in the values we hold dear.
His arresting conclusion is that, in order for us to lead value-laden lives, what is necessary is that we ourselves should die and that others should live. Keywords: afterlife , immortality , human extinction , future generations , survival , value , death , meaning of life , egoism , climate change , P. James , Bernard Williams.
Forgot password? Don't have an account? Idries Shah: Sufis. This book gives a comprehensive account of the British Idealist approach to international relations from the s to s. In an attempt to historically contextualise the shifts in several British …. Nagapriya: Exploring Karma and Rebirth. This thought-provoking book clarifies these traditional Buddhist …. Patricia Marsh: Not in My Philosophy. Join the author on her intriguing journey to …. Checkout 0, During checkout, you can choose an additional, free ebook!
The responses are each sound, although they seem a bit dimmed by their necessary deference to Scheffler. They don't present ideas as much as they interpret his.
And his final response is much to categorical for a Kindle to handle - he constantly references the points made by the respondents almost in a shorthand, and it was tough finding the references back and forth in the Kindle. The reason to read this book is the original lecture - a real perspective changer.
Then create your own response. Glad I read it, and it's recommended mostly for those who want to think deep thoughts about why we act like we do, particularly when we consider our mortality and that of our species as a whole.
Mar 01, David rated it really liked it Shelves: philosophy. Scheffler provides some very thought-provoking reflections in his lectures on the relationship between our values, death and the extinction of the human race. It's excellent to see these sorts of questions being discussed in contemporary anglophone philosophy. Scheffler's reflections, as I said, are thought provoking, but they are also often quite limited in depth and rigor, instead being wide-ranging and speculative.
On the upside, the responses to Scheffler are all excellent and bring the clai Scheffler provides some very thought-provoking reflections in his lectures on the relationship between our values, death and the extinction of the human race.
On the upside, the responses to Scheffler are all excellent and bring the claims and themes of Scheffler's lectures under a more rigorous light, challenging him on all the right points though Frankfurt's is unfortunately brief. Scheffler's reply, too, is more critically engaged and interesting. The quality of the second half of the book easily makes up for the shortcomings in the first.
Mar 31, Mary rated it it was ok. The proposition raised in this book did not seem that significant. The book raises several thought experiments: would how would life be worth living if all humanity were going to end soon after our own death; to what extent is fear of death related to our worry about what happens after; is the fear of the extinction of humanity greater than the fear of our own death?
But, upon reflection, these questions do not appear to have any answers not just that Scheffler and his respondents do not answ The proposition raised in this book did not seem that significant.
I kept reading thinking this would lead to something thought provoking and useful, but I kept finding myself thinking "why does this matter? Aug 14, Albert rated it really liked it. This is not what you think it is about. Scheffler could care less what happens to us after we die. This book is about the lives of those around us and how our death will affect them. Just as a thought experiment, think how you would go out of your way not to commit suicide in front of someone you love. You might kill yourself three blocks away but you wouldn't dream of doing it in front of them.
Why should it matter? You are dead either way. Interesting read. This is a well-written and fascinating book—Read it! Feb 04, Mark rated it really liked it. Gives short shrift to personalized notions of immortality Christian soul , opting that immortality is defined by progeny and culture. We are defined by mortality, but yearn for immortality.
How do we leave legacy? Thought-provoking and comforting. We hope humanity continues - compelling argument for combating climate change and space exploration for another settlement. Are we Hegelian, subsumed into history, make Romantic strides, or give in to existential dilemma? May 22, Russell Warfield rated it it was amazing.
Thrillingly original. Easy to read, hard to swallow, both eerily terrifying and truly inspiring. Without hyperbole, this made me think very differently about myself and humans in general.
Brilliant stuff, and convincing. Really excellent philosophy. Nov 27, Will Corvin rated it really liked it. His arresting end is that, to ensure that us to steer value-laden lives, what's beneficial is that we ourselves should still die and that others may still dwell. Death and the Afterlife concludes with statement by way of 4 amazing philosophers--Harry Frankfurt, Niko Kolodny, Seana Shiffrin, and Susan Wolf--who speak about Scheffler's principles with perception and mind's eye.
Scheffler provides a last reply. Whereas sleek americans attempt to regulate approximately each element in their lives, many people abandon keep an eye on of life's ultimate passage. From one of many maximum felony injustices of our time sprang the most unlikely—and unforgettable—love tales. Death Anxiety and Clinical Practice - download pdf or read online.
0コメント